While we dialogue, others die: A response to ‘The possibilities and limits to dialogue’

Derek Alderman, Joshua F. Inwood

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We revisit Martin Luther King Jr’s famous Letter from a Birmingham Jail (2013 [1963]), using his words to frame our thinking about the promise, limits, and efficacy of dialogue. The life and death politics of everyday oppressed people should directly inform any consideration of the merits of scholars engaging in (or disengaging from) dialogue, what they ultimately say, and with whom they engage in dialogue and political action. The stakes are too high—for the academy, broader society, and especially for those groups who bear the direct burden of injustice—not to engage in scholarly dialogue and debate. It is also important for scholars to communicate in resonant ways and enhance the value of their academic dialogue to oppressed groups. The most significant threat to scholarly dialogue is not necessarily from extremists; rather, the challenge lies in creating consequential dialogue with those who remain silent and indifferent in the face of what King called ‘the deep groans and passionate yearnings of the oppressed’.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)152-155
Number of pages4
JournalDialogues in Human Geography
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

politics
dialogue
political action
society
academy
Group
threat
death
Values

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

@article{291e8abef1cb4b26843319d57d393873,
title = "While we dialogue, others die: A response to ‘The possibilities and limits to dialogue’",
abstract = "We revisit Martin Luther King Jr’s famous Letter from a Birmingham Jail (2013 [1963]), using his words to frame our thinking about the promise, limits, and efficacy of dialogue. The life and death politics of everyday oppressed people should directly inform any consideration of the merits of scholars engaging in (or disengaging from) dialogue, what they ultimately say, and with whom they engage in dialogue and political action. The stakes are too high—for the academy, broader society, and especially for those groups who bear the direct burden of injustice—not to engage in scholarly dialogue and debate. It is also important for scholars to communicate in resonant ways and enhance the value of their academic dialogue to oppressed groups. The most significant threat to scholarly dialogue is not necessarily from extremists; rather, the challenge lies in creating consequential dialogue with those who remain silent and indifferent in the face of what King called ‘the deep groans and passionate yearnings of the oppressed’.",
author = "Derek Alderman and Inwood, {Joshua F.}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2043820618780579",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "152--155",
journal = "Dialogues in Human Geography",
issn = "2043-8206",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

While we dialogue, others die : A response to ‘The possibilities and limits to dialogue’. / Alderman, Derek; Inwood, Joshua F.

In: Dialogues in Human Geography, Vol. 8, No. 2, 01.07.2018, p. 152-155.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - While we dialogue, others die

T2 - A response to ‘The possibilities and limits to dialogue’

AU - Alderman, Derek

AU - Inwood, Joshua F.

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - We revisit Martin Luther King Jr’s famous Letter from a Birmingham Jail (2013 [1963]), using his words to frame our thinking about the promise, limits, and efficacy of dialogue. The life and death politics of everyday oppressed people should directly inform any consideration of the merits of scholars engaging in (or disengaging from) dialogue, what they ultimately say, and with whom they engage in dialogue and political action. The stakes are too high—for the academy, broader society, and especially for those groups who bear the direct burden of injustice—not to engage in scholarly dialogue and debate. It is also important for scholars to communicate in resonant ways and enhance the value of their academic dialogue to oppressed groups. The most significant threat to scholarly dialogue is not necessarily from extremists; rather, the challenge lies in creating consequential dialogue with those who remain silent and indifferent in the face of what King called ‘the deep groans and passionate yearnings of the oppressed’.

AB - We revisit Martin Luther King Jr’s famous Letter from a Birmingham Jail (2013 [1963]), using his words to frame our thinking about the promise, limits, and efficacy of dialogue. The life and death politics of everyday oppressed people should directly inform any consideration of the merits of scholars engaging in (or disengaging from) dialogue, what they ultimately say, and with whom they engage in dialogue and political action. The stakes are too high—for the academy, broader society, and especially for those groups who bear the direct burden of injustice—not to engage in scholarly dialogue and debate. It is also important for scholars to communicate in resonant ways and enhance the value of their academic dialogue to oppressed groups. The most significant threat to scholarly dialogue is not necessarily from extremists; rather, the challenge lies in creating consequential dialogue with those who remain silent and indifferent in the face of what King called ‘the deep groans and passionate yearnings of the oppressed’.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049907175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049907175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2043820618780579

DO - 10.1177/2043820618780579

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85049907175

VL - 8

SP - 152

EP - 155

JO - Dialogues in Human Geography

JF - Dialogues in Human Geography

SN - 2043-8206

IS - 2

ER -