White support for racial referenda in the deep south

Byron D.Andra Orey, L. Marvin Overby, Peter K. Hatemi, Baodong Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This research examines two referenda in the Deep South, both of which can be categorized as antiblack. Specifically, we analyze a 2001 Mississippi flag referendum (in which the electorate rejected a new flag and retained the old state flag containing a Confederate insignia) and a 2004 referendum in Alabama (in which citizens voted to retain unenforceable constitutional language requiring separate educational facilities for black and white students, and a poll tax on voting). Using state election returns and census data, we employ weighted least squares regression to analyze voting patterns. The results reveal that across both states, white voters displayed significantly greater "antiblack" voting behavior in those areas with larger black populations and more urbanized environments. Our findings pose a direct challenge to both those who insist that the "racial threat" perceived by whites is diminishing and those who hold that urbanization will ultimately be corrosive of racist attitudes and behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)539-558
Number of pages20
JournalPolitics and Policy
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2011

Fingerprint

referendum
voting
voting behavior
taxes
urbanization
census
election
threat
citizen
regression
language
student

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Orey, Byron D.Andra ; Overby, L. Marvin ; Hatemi, Peter K. ; Liu, Baodong. / White support for racial referenda in the deep south. In: Politics and Policy. 2011 ; Vol. 39, No. 4. pp. 539-558.
@article{23e01f3115b94c60a66a5f1b0eeff646,
title = "White support for racial referenda in the deep south",
abstract = "This research examines two referenda in the Deep South, both of which can be categorized as antiblack. Specifically, we analyze a 2001 Mississippi flag referendum (in which the electorate rejected a new flag and retained the old state flag containing a Confederate insignia) and a 2004 referendum in Alabama (in which citizens voted to retain unenforceable constitutional language requiring separate educational facilities for black and white students, and a poll tax on voting). Using state election returns and census data, we employ weighted least squares regression to analyze voting patterns. The results reveal that across both states, white voters displayed significantly greater {"}antiblack{"} voting behavior in those areas with larger black populations and more urbanized environments. Our findings pose a direct challenge to both those who insist that the {"}racial threat{"} perceived by whites is diminishing and those who hold that urbanization will ultimately be corrosive of racist attitudes and behavior.",
author = "Orey, {Byron D.Andra} and Overby, {L. Marvin} and Hatemi, {Peter K.} and Baodong Liu",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1747-1346.2011.00303.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "539--558",
journal = "Politics and Policy",
issn = "1555-5623",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

White support for racial referenda in the deep south. / Orey, Byron D.Andra; Overby, L. Marvin; Hatemi, Peter K.; Liu, Baodong.

In: Politics and Policy, Vol. 39, No. 4, 01.08.2011, p. 539-558.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - White support for racial referenda in the deep south

AU - Orey, Byron D.Andra

AU - Overby, L. Marvin

AU - Hatemi, Peter K.

AU - Liu, Baodong

PY - 2011/8/1

Y1 - 2011/8/1

N2 - This research examines two referenda in the Deep South, both of which can be categorized as antiblack. Specifically, we analyze a 2001 Mississippi flag referendum (in which the electorate rejected a new flag and retained the old state flag containing a Confederate insignia) and a 2004 referendum in Alabama (in which citizens voted to retain unenforceable constitutional language requiring separate educational facilities for black and white students, and a poll tax on voting). Using state election returns and census data, we employ weighted least squares regression to analyze voting patterns. The results reveal that across both states, white voters displayed significantly greater "antiblack" voting behavior in those areas with larger black populations and more urbanized environments. Our findings pose a direct challenge to both those who insist that the "racial threat" perceived by whites is diminishing and those who hold that urbanization will ultimately be corrosive of racist attitudes and behavior.

AB - This research examines two referenda in the Deep South, both of which can be categorized as antiblack. Specifically, we analyze a 2001 Mississippi flag referendum (in which the electorate rejected a new flag and retained the old state flag containing a Confederate insignia) and a 2004 referendum in Alabama (in which citizens voted to retain unenforceable constitutional language requiring separate educational facilities for black and white students, and a poll tax on voting). Using state election returns and census data, we employ weighted least squares regression to analyze voting patterns. The results reveal that across both states, white voters displayed significantly greater "antiblack" voting behavior in those areas with larger black populations and more urbanized environments. Our findings pose a direct challenge to both those who insist that the "racial threat" perceived by whites is diminishing and those who hold that urbanization will ultimately be corrosive of racist attitudes and behavior.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960754571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960754571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1747-1346.2011.00303.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1747-1346.2011.00303.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79960754571

VL - 39

SP - 539

EP - 558

JO - Politics and Policy

JF - Politics and Policy

SN - 1555-5623

IS - 4

ER -