Who is a refugee? Twenty-five years of domestic implementation and judicial interpretation of the 1969 OAU and 1951 UN refugee conventions in post-apartheid South Africa

Tiyanjana Maluwa, S. C. Anton Katz

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

As a party to the UN Refugee Convention and the OAU Refugee Convention, South Africa is obligated to apply international refugee law when addressing the protection needs of asylum seekers in the country. The Refugees Act, 1998 encapsulates the cardinal principles of the two conventions. This essay discusses how government officials and judges have interpreted and applied these principles in asylum application cases. These cases demonstrate that officials are either not always fully conversant with the legal obligations, incumbent upon the government, arising from both international law and domestic law or purposefully ignore them. For the most part, officials tend to treat asylum seekers presumptively as economic migrants rather than bona fide refugees entitled to proper scrutiny under the criteria set out in the refugee conventions. This approach has resulted in gaps between legal protection and practical protection of refugees in South Africa and has on several occasions been criticized and rejected by courts, including the Constitutional Court of South Africa.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)129-205
Number of pages77
JournalIndiana Journal of Global Legal Studies
Volume27
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Law

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Who is a refugee? Twenty-five years of domestic implementation and judicial interpretation of the 1969 OAU and 1951 UN refugee conventions in post-apartheid South Africa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this