Why calls for more routine carotid stenting are currently inappropriate: An international, multispecialty, expert review and position statement

Anne L. Abbott, Mark A. Adelman, Andrei V. Alexandrov, P. Alan Barber, Henry J.M. Barnett, Jonathan Beard, Peter Bell, Martin Björck, David Blacker, Leo H. Bonati, Martin M. Brown, Clifford J. Buckley, Richard P. Cambria, John E. Castaldo, Anthony J. Comerota, E. Sander Connolly, Ronald L. Dalman, Alun H. Davies, Hans Henning Eckstein, Rishad FaruqiThomas E. Feasby, Gustav Fraedrich, Peter Gloviczki, Graeme J. Hankey, Robert E. Harbaugh, Eitan Heldenberg, Michael G. Hennerici, Michael D. Hill, Timothy J. Kleinig, Dimitri P. Mikhailidis, Wesley S. Moore, Ross Naylor, Andrew Nicolaides, Kosmas I. Paraskevas, David M. Pelz, James W. Prichard, Grant Purdie, Jean Baptiste Ricco, Peter A. Ringleb, Thomas Riles, Peter M. Rothwell, Peter Sandercock, Henrik Sillesen, J. David Spence, Francesco Spinelli, Jonathon Sturm, Aaron Tan, Ankur Thapar, Frank J. Veith, Tissa Wijeratne, Wei Zhou

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

44 Scopus citations
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1186-1190
Number of pages5
JournalStroke
Volume44
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Cite this