Why do liberals drink lattes?

Daniel DellaPosta, Yongren Shi, Michael Macy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Popular accounts of “lifestyle politics” and “culture wars” suggest that political and ideological divisions extend also to leisure activities, consumption, aesthetic taste, and personal morality. Drawing on a total of 22,572 pairwise correlations from the General Social Survey (1972–2010), the authors provide comprehensive empirical support for the anecdotal accounts. Moreover, most ideological differences in lifestyle cannot be explained by demographic covariates alone. The authors propose a surprisingly simple solution to the puzzle of lifestyle politics. Computational experiments show how the self-reinforcing dynamics of homophily and influence dramatically amplify even very small elective affinities between lifestyle and ideology, producing a stereotypical world of “latte liberals” and “bird-hunting conservatives” much like the one in which we live.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1473-1511
Number of pages39
JournalAmerican Journal of Sociology
Volume120
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 27 2015

Fingerprint

politics
morality
aesthetics
ideology
experiment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

DellaPosta, Daniel ; Shi, Yongren ; Macy, Michael. / Why do liberals drink lattes?. In: American Journal of Sociology. 2015 ; Vol. 120, No. 5. pp. 1473-1511.
@article{35837b3b390640b58511ae6293a0ae3d,
title = "Why do liberals drink lattes?",
abstract = "Popular accounts of “lifestyle politics” and “culture wars” suggest that political and ideological divisions extend also to leisure activities, consumption, aesthetic taste, and personal morality. Drawing on a total of 22,572 pairwise correlations from the General Social Survey (1972–2010), the authors provide comprehensive empirical support for the anecdotal accounts. Moreover, most ideological differences in lifestyle cannot be explained by demographic covariates alone. The authors propose a surprisingly simple solution to the puzzle of lifestyle politics. Computational experiments show how the self-reinforcing dynamics of homophily and influence dramatically amplify even very small elective affinities between lifestyle and ideology, producing a stereotypical world of “latte liberals” and “bird-hunting conservatives” much like the one in which we live.",
author = "Daniel DellaPosta and Yongren Shi and Michael Macy",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1086/681254",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "120",
pages = "1473--1511",
journal = "American Journal of Sociology",
issn = "0002-9602",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "5",

}

Why do liberals drink lattes? / DellaPosta, Daniel; Shi, Yongren; Macy, Michael.

In: American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 120, No. 5, 27.06.2015, p. 1473-1511.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why do liberals drink lattes?

AU - DellaPosta, Daniel

AU - Shi, Yongren

AU - Macy, Michael

PY - 2015/6/27

Y1 - 2015/6/27

N2 - Popular accounts of “lifestyle politics” and “culture wars” suggest that political and ideological divisions extend also to leisure activities, consumption, aesthetic taste, and personal morality. Drawing on a total of 22,572 pairwise correlations from the General Social Survey (1972–2010), the authors provide comprehensive empirical support for the anecdotal accounts. Moreover, most ideological differences in lifestyle cannot be explained by demographic covariates alone. The authors propose a surprisingly simple solution to the puzzle of lifestyle politics. Computational experiments show how the self-reinforcing dynamics of homophily and influence dramatically amplify even very small elective affinities between lifestyle and ideology, producing a stereotypical world of “latte liberals” and “bird-hunting conservatives” much like the one in which we live.

AB - Popular accounts of “lifestyle politics” and “culture wars” suggest that political and ideological divisions extend also to leisure activities, consumption, aesthetic taste, and personal morality. Drawing on a total of 22,572 pairwise correlations from the General Social Survey (1972–2010), the authors provide comprehensive empirical support for the anecdotal accounts. Moreover, most ideological differences in lifestyle cannot be explained by demographic covariates alone. The authors propose a surprisingly simple solution to the puzzle of lifestyle politics. Computational experiments show how the self-reinforcing dynamics of homophily and influence dramatically amplify even very small elective affinities between lifestyle and ideology, producing a stereotypical world of “latte liberals” and “bird-hunting conservatives” much like the one in which we live.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84933041014&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84933041014&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/681254

DO - 10.1086/681254

M3 - Article

C2 - 26421344

AN - SCOPUS:84933041014

VL - 120

SP - 1473

EP - 1511

JO - American Journal of Sociology

JF - American Journal of Sociology

SN - 0002-9602

IS - 5

ER -