Why do similar patterns of tropical convection yield extratropical circulation anomalies of opposite sign?

Michael Goss, Steven B. Feldstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Tropical precipitation anomalies associated with El Niño and Madden-Julian oscillation (MJO) phase 1 (La Niña and MJO phase 5) are characterized by a tripole, with positive (negative) centers over the Indian Ocean and central Pacific and a negative (positive) center over the warm pool region. However, their midlatitude circulation responses over the North Pacific and North America tend to be of opposite sign. To investigate these differences in the extratropical response to tropical convection, the dynamical core of a climate model is used, with boreal winter climatology as the initial flow. The model is run using the full heating field for the above four cases, and with heating restricted to each of seven small domains located near or over the equator, to investigate which convective anomalies may be responsible for the different extratropical responses. An analogous observational study is also performed. For both studies, it is found that, despite having a similar tropical convective anomaly spatial pattern, the extratropical response to El Niño and MJO phase 1 (La Niña and MJO phase 5) is quite different. Most notably, responses with opposite-signed upper-tropospheric geopotential height anomalies are found over the eastern North Pacific, northwestern North America, and the southeastern United States. The extratropical response for each convective case most closely resembles that for the domain associated with the largest-amplitude precipitation anomaly: the central equatorial Pacific for El Niño and La Niña and the warm pool region for MJO phases 1 and 5.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)487-511
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Volume74
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Madden-Julian oscillation
convection
anomaly
warm pool
heating
geopotential
climatology
climate modeling
winter

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

@article{9b99850bf9b44a2dbe63dbf247bf5294,
title = "Why do similar patterns of tropical convection yield extratropical circulation anomalies of opposite sign?",
abstract = "Tropical precipitation anomalies associated with El Ni{\~n}o and Madden-Julian oscillation (MJO) phase 1 (La Ni{\~n}a and MJO phase 5) are characterized by a tripole, with positive (negative) centers over the Indian Ocean and central Pacific and a negative (positive) center over the warm pool region. However, their midlatitude circulation responses over the North Pacific and North America tend to be of opposite sign. To investigate these differences in the extratropical response to tropical convection, the dynamical core of a climate model is used, with boreal winter climatology as the initial flow. The model is run using the full heating field for the above four cases, and with heating restricted to each of seven small domains located near or over the equator, to investigate which convective anomalies may be responsible for the different extratropical responses. An analogous observational study is also performed. For both studies, it is found that, despite having a similar tropical convective anomaly spatial pattern, the extratropical response to El Ni{\~n}o and MJO phase 1 (La Ni{\~n}a and MJO phase 5) is quite different. Most notably, responses with opposite-signed upper-tropospheric geopotential height anomalies are found over the eastern North Pacific, northwestern North America, and the southeastern United States. The extratropical response for each convective case most closely resembles that for the domain associated with the largest-amplitude precipitation anomaly: the central equatorial Pacific for El Ni{\~n}o and La Ni{\~n}a and the warm pool region for MJO phases 1 and 5.",
author = "Michael Goss and Feldstein, {Steven B.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1175/JAS-D-16-0067.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "487--511",
journal = "Journals of the Atmospheric Sciences",
issn = "0022-4928",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "2",

}

Why do similar patterns of tropical convection yield extratropical circulation anomalies of opposite sign? / Goss, Michael; Feldstein, Steven B.

In: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 74, No. 2, 01.01.2017, p. 487-511.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why do similar patterns of tropical convection yield extratropical circulation anomalies of opposite sign?

AU - Goss, Michael

AU - Feldstein, Steven B.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Tropical precipitation anomalies associated with El Niño and Madden-Julian oscillation (MJO) phase 1 (La Niña and MJO phase 5) are characterized by a tripole, with positive (negative) centers over the Indian Ocean and central Pacific and a negative (positive) center over the warm pool region. However, their midlatitude circulation responses over the North Pacific and North America tend to be of opposite sign. To investigate these differences in the extratropical response to tropical convection, the dynamical core of a climate model is used, with boreal winter climatology as the initial flow. The model is run using the full heating field for the above four cases, and with heating restricted to each of seven small domains located near or over the equator, to investigate which convective anomalies may be responsible for the different extratropical responses. An analogous observational study is also performed. For both studies, it is found that, despite having a similar tropical convective anomaly spatial pattern, the extratropical response to El Niño and MJO phase 1 (La Niña and MJO phase 5) is quite different. Most notably, responses with opposite-signed upper-tropospheric geopotential height anomalies are found over the eastern North Pacific, northwestern North America, and the southeastern United States. The extratropical response for each convective case most closely resembles that for the domain associated with the largest-amplitude precipitation anomaly: the central equatorial Pacific for El Niño and La Niña and the warm pool region for MJO phases 1 and 5.

AB - Tropical precipitation anomalies associated with El Niño and Madden-Julian oscillation (MJO) phase 1 (La Niña and MJO phase 5) are characterized by a tripole, with positive (negative) centers over the Indian Ocean and central Pacific and a negative (positive) center over the warm pool region. However, their midlatitude circulation responses over the North Pacific and North America tend to be of opposite sign. To investigate these differences in the extratropical response to tropical convection, the dynamical core of a climate model is used, with boreal winter climatology as the initial flow. The model is run using the full heating field for the above four cases, and with heating restricted to each of seven small domains located near or over the equator, to investigate which convective anomalies may be responsible for the different extratropical responses. An analogous observational study is also performed. For both studies, it is found that, despite having a similar tropical convective anomaly spatial pattern, the extratropical response to El Niño and MJO phase 1 (La Niña and MJO phase 5) is quite different. Most notably, responses with opposite-signed upper-tropospheric geopotential height anomalies are found over the eastern North Pacific, northwestern North America, and the southeastern United States. The extratropical response for each convective case most closely resembles that for the domain associated with the largest-amplitude precipitation anomaly: the central equatorial Pacific for El Niño and La Niña and the warm pool region for MJO phases 1 and 5.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011661518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011661518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1175/JAS-D-16-0067.1

DO - 10.1175/JAS-D-16-0067.1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85011661518

VL - 74

SP - 487

EP - 511

JO - Journals of the Atmospheric Sciences

JF - Journals of the Atmospheric Sciences

SN - 0022-4928

IS - 2

ER -