Why is making important for the culture of design?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

A select review of making in design in an epistemological framework presents two dominant approaches and a less practiced third approach. Whereas the first two value the control and accuracy in the processing of information, the third values the uncertainties in the processing of materials. Whereas the first two rely on final product and prior knowledge, the third relies on the processes of formation and flows of matter, and thus is key to a dynamic and sustainable model for design.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCAADRIA 2016, 21st International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia - Living Systems and Micro-Utopias
Subtitle of host publicationTowards Continuous Designing
EditorsMarc Aurel Schnabel, Walaiporn Nakapan, Stanislav Roudavski, Sheng-Fen Chien, Mi Jeong Kim, Seungyeon Choo
PublisherThe Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA)
Pages851-860
Number of pages10
ISBN (Electronic)9789881902672
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016
Event21st International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia: Living Systems and Micro-Utopias: Towards Continuous Designing, CAADRIA 2016 - Melbourne, Australia
Duration: Mar 30 2016Apr 2 2016

Publication series

NameCAADRIA 2016, 21st International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia - Living Systems and Micro-Utopias: Towards Continuous Designing

Other

Other21st International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia: Living Systems and Micro-Utopias: Towards Continuous Designing, CAADRIA 2016
Country/TerritoryAustralia
CityMelbourne
Period3/30/164/2/16

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
  • Building and Construction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why is making important for the culture of design?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this