Why We Believe in Democracy: Testing Theories of Attitude Functions and Democracy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study tested different attitude function theories, as well as hypotheses democratic theorists have developed regarding the bases of pro‐democratic attitudes. Two hundred and sixty‐six undergraduates explained why they believed in democracy, rating the aptness of 40 sentences operationalizing attitude functions, as well as the persuasiveness of six arguments framed in terms of these functions. Factor analysis suggested the existence of either four or six distinct attitude functions. Functional saliences were weakly predictive of persuasiveness ratings, and regression analyses revealed semipartial correlations between functions and age, estimated parents' income, and attitude strength. Implications were drawn for both functional theory and democratic theory and practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)423-440
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume22
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992

Fingerprint

Democracy
Statistical Factor Analysis
Parents
Regression Analysis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

@article{3ceadf87a4894af7ae8837d36b0f7577,
title = "Why We Believe in Democracy: Testing Theories of Attitude Functions and Democracy",
abstract = "This study tested different attitude function theories, as well as hypotheses democratic theorists have developed regarding the bases of pro‐democratic attitudes. Two hundred and sixty‐six undergraduates explained why they believed in democracy, rating the aptness of 40 sentences operationalizing attitude functions, as well as the persuasiveness of six arguments framed in terms of these functions. Factor analysis suggested the existence of either four or six distinct attitude functions. Functional saliences were weakly predictive of persuasiveness ratings, and regression analyses revealed semipartial correlations between functions and age, estimated parents' income, and attitude strength. Implications were drawn for both functional theory and democratic theory and practice.",
author = "Gastil, {John W.}",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00983.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "423--440",
journal = "Journal of Applied Social Psychology",
issn = "0021-9029",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

Why We Believe in Democracy : Testing Theories of Attitude Functions and Democracy. / Gastil, John W.

In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 22, No. 6, 01.01.1992, p. 423-440.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why We Believe in Democracy

T2 - Testing Theories of Attitude Functions and Democracy

AU - Gastil, John W.

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - This study tested different attitude function theories, as well as hypotheses democratic theorists have developed regarding the bases of pro‐democratic attitudes. Two hundred and sixty‐six undergraduates explained why they believed in democracy, rating the aptness of 40 sentences operationalizing attitude functions, as well as the persuasiveness of six arguments framed in terms of these functions. Factor analysis suggested the existence of either four or six distinct attitude functions. Functional saliences were weakly predictive of persuasiveness ratings, and regression analyses revealed semipartial correlations between functions and age, estimated parents' income, and attitude strength. Implications were drawn for both functional theory and democratic theory and practice.

AB - This study tested different attitude function theories, as well as hypotheses democratic theorists have developed regarding the bases of pro‐democratic attitudes. Two hundred and sixty‐six undergraduates explained why they believed in democracy, rating the aptness of 40 sentences operationalizing attitude functions, as well as the persuasiveness of six arguments framed in terms of these functions. Factor analysis suggested the existence of either four or six distinct attitude functions. Functional saliences were weakly predictive of persuasiveness ratings, and regression analyses revealed semipartial correlations between functions and age, estimated parents' income, and attitude strength. Implications were drawn for both functional theory and democratic theory and practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991160804&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991160804&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00983.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00983.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84991160804

VL - 22

SP - 423

EP - 440

JO - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

SN - 0021-9029

IS - 6

ER -