Wolbachia-Associated Bacterial Protection in the Mosquito Aedes aegypti

Yixin H. Ye, Megan Woolfit, Edwige Rancès, Scott L. O'Neill, Elizabeth Mcgraw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background:Wolbachia infections confer protection for their insect hosts against a range of pathogens including bacteria, viruses, nematodes and the malaria parasite. A single mechanism that might explain this broad-based pathogen protection is immune priming, in which the presence of the symbiont upregulates the basal immune response, preparing the insect to defend against subsequent pathogen infection. A study that compared natural Wolbachia infections in Drosophila melanogaster with the mosquito vector Aedes aegypti artificially transinfected with the same strains has suggested that innate immune priming may only occur in recent host-Wolbachia associations. This same study also revealed that while immune priming may play a role in viral protection it cannot explain the entirety of the effect.Methodology/Findings:Here we assess whether the level of innate immune priming induced by different Wolbachia strains in A. aegypti is correlated with the degree of protection conferred against bacterial pathogens. We show that Wolbachia strains wMel and wMelPop, currently being tested for field release for dengue biocontrol, differ in their protective abilities. The wMelPop strain provides stronger, more broad-based protection than wMel, and this is likely explained by both the higher induction of immune gene expression and the strain-specific activation of particular genes. We also show that Wolbachia densities themselves decline during pathogen infection, likely as a result of the immune induction.Conclusions/Significance:This work shows a correlation between innate immune priming and bacterial protection phenotypes. The ability of the Toll pathway, melanisation and antimicrobial peptides to enhance viral protection or to provide the basis of malaria protection should be further explored in the context of this two-strain comparison. This work raises the questions of whether Wolbachia may improve the ability of wild mosquitoes to survive pathogen infection or alter the natural composition of gut flora, and thus have broader consequences for host fitness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere2362
JournalPLoS neglected tropical diseases
Volume7
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Wolbachia
Aedes
Culicidae
Infection
Malaria
Insects
Dengue
Drosophila melanogaster
Transcriptional Activation
Parasites
Up-Regulation
Viruses
Bacteria
Phenotype
Gene Expression
Peptides

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Ye, Yixin H. ; Woolfit, Megan ; Rancès, Edwige ; O'Neill, Scott L. ; Mcgraw, Elizabeth. / Wolbachia-Associated Bacterial Protection in the Mosquito Aedes aegypti. In: PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2013 ; Vol. 7, No. 8.
@article{780f4ebc7d0e461091720e6af29c8d5f,
title = "Wolbachia-Associated Bacterial Protection in the Mosquito Aedes aegypti",
abstract = "Background:Wolbachia infections confer protection for their insect hosts against a range of pathogens including bacteria, viruses, nematodes and the malaria parasite. A single mechanism that might explain this broad-based pathogen protection is immune priming, in which the presence of the symbiont upregulates the basal immune response, preparing the insect to defend against subsequent pathogen infection. A study that compared natural Wolbachia infections in Drosophila melanogaster with the mosquito vector Aedes aegypti artificially transinfected with the same strains has suggested that innate immune priming may only occur in recent host-Wolbachia associations. This same study also revealed that while immune priming may play a role in viral protection it cannot explain the entirety of the effect.Methodology/Findings:Here we assess whether the level of innate immune priming induced by different Wolbachia strains in A. aegypti is correlated with the degree of protection conferred against bacterial pathogens. We show that Wolbachia strains wMel and wMelPop, currently being tested for field release for dengue biocontrol, differ in their protective abilities. The wMelPop strain provides stronger, more broad-based protection than wMel, and this is likely explained by both the higher induction of immune gene expression and the strain-specific activation of particular genes. We also show that Wolbachia densities themselves decline during pathogen infection, likely as a result of the immune induction.Conclusions/Significance:This work shows a correlation between innate immune priming and bacterial protection phenotypes. The ability of the Toll pathway, melanisation and antimicrobial peptides to enhance viral protection or to provide the basis of malaria protection should be further explored in the context of this two-strain comparison. This work raises the questions of whether Wolbachia may improve the ability of wild mosquitoes to survive pathogen infection or alter the natural composition of gut flora, and thus have broader consequences for host fitness.",
author = "Ye, {Yixin H.} and Megan Woolfit and Edwige Ranc{\`e}s and O'Neill, {Scott L.} and Elizabeth Mcgraw",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pntd.0002362",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
journal = "PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases",
issn = "1935-2727",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "8",

}

Wolbachia-Associated Bacterial Protection in the Mosquito Aedes aegypti. / Ye, Yixin H.; Woolfit, Megan; Rancès, Edwige; O'Neill, Scott L.; Mcgraw, Elizabeth.

In: PLoS neglected tropical diseases, Vol. 7, No. 8, e2362, 01.01.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wolbachia-Associated Bacterial Protection in the Mosquito Aedes aegypti

AU - Ye, Yixin H.

AU - Woolfit, Megan

AU - Rancès, Edwige

AU - O'Neill, Scott L.

AU - Mcgraw, Elizabeth

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Background:Wolbachia infections confer protection for their insect hosts against a range of pathogens including bacteria, viruses, nematodes and the malaria parasite. A single mechanism that might explain this broad-based pathogen protection is immune priming, in which the presence of the symbiont upregulates the basal immune response, preparing the insect to defend against subsequent pathogen infection. A study that compared natural Wolbachia infections in Drosophila melanogaster with the mosquito vector Aedes aegypti artificially transinfected with the same strains has suggested that innate immune priming may only occur in recent host-Wolbachia associations. This same study also revealed that while immune priming may play a role in viral protection it cannot explain the entirety of the effect.Methodology/Findings:Here we assess whether the level of innate immune priming induced by different Wolbachia strains in A. aegypti is correlated with the degree of protection conferred against bacterial pathogens. We show that Wolbachia strains wMel and wMelPop, currently being tested for field release for dengue biocontrol, differ in their protective abilities. The wMelPop strain provides stronger, more broad-based protection than wMel, and this is likely explained by both the higher induction of immune gene expression and the strain-specific activation of particular genes. We also show that Wolbachia densities themselves decline during pathogen infection, likely as a result of the immune induction.Conclusions/Significance:This work shows a correlation between innate immune priming and bacterial protection phenotypes. The ability of the Toll pathway, melanisation and antimicrobial peptides to enhance viral protection or to provide the basis of malaria protection should be further explored in the context of this two-strain comparison. This work raises the questions of whether Wolbachia may improve the ability of wild mosquitoes to survive pathogen infection or alter the natural composition of gut flora, and thus have broader consequences for host fitness.

AB - Background:Wolbachia infections confer protection for their insect hosts against a range of pathogens including bacteria, viruses, nematodes and the malaria parasite. A single mechanism that might explain this broad-based pathogen protection is immune priming, in which the presence of the symbiont upregulates the basal immune response, preparing the insect to defend against subsequent pathogen infection. A study that compared natural Wolbachia infections in Drosophila melanogaster with the mosquito vector Aedes aegypti artificially transinfected with the same strains has suggested that innate immune priming may only occur in recent host-Wolbachia associations. This same study also revealed that while immune priming may play a role in viral protection it cannot explain the entirety of the effect.Methodology/Findings:Here we assess whether the level of innate immune priming induced by different Wolbachia strains in A. aegypti is correlated with the degree of protection conferred against bacterial pathogens. We show that Wolbachia strains wMel and wMelPop, currently being tested for field release for dengue biocontrol, differ in their protective abilities. The wMelPop strain provides stronger, more broad-based protection than wMel, and this is likely explained by both the higher induction of immune gene expression and the strain-specific activation of particular genes. We also show that Wolbachia densities themselves decline during pathogen infection, likely as a result of the immune induction.Conclusions/Significance:This work shows a correlation between innate immune priming and bacterial protection phenotypes. The ability of the Toll pathway, melanisation and antimicrobial peptides to enhance viral protection or to provide the basis of malaria protection should be further explored in the context of this two-strain comparison. This work raises the questions of whether Wolbachia may improve the ability of wild mosquitoes to survive pathogen infection or alter the natural composition of gut flora, and thus have broader consequences for host fitness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883403571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883403571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002362

DO - 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002362

M3 - Article

C2 - 23951381

AN - SCOPUS:84883403571

VL - 7

JO - PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases

JF - PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases

SN - 1935-2727

IS - 8

M1 - e2362

ER -