Worker Participation and the Spillover Effect: The Case of Labor-Management Committees

Steven Ames Peterson, Thomas A. Leitko, Wilford G. Miles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Theoretical expectations of participatory theorists (e.g. Pateman, Blumberg) are applied to labor management committees (LMCs) in an effort to predict the spillover effects of workers’ participation in firm decision-making on their political and social participation. The two focal points are Jamestown, N.Y. and Buffalo, N.Y. Witte has argued that conditions may obstruct the hypothesized spillover effects from occurring: co-optation, structural impotence, and misrepresentation. In Jamestown and Buffalo, evidence that all three can be expected is found. The hypothesized spillover effects are not likely to emerge from the LMC experiments in the areas studied. It is suggested that structural impotence is perhaps the major obstruction to the spillover effect in these cases and in firms in capitalist economies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-44
Number of pages18
JournalEconomic and Industrial Democracy
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1981

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Worker Participation and the Spillover Effect: The Case of Labor-Management Committees'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this