Worker Participation and the Spillover Effect: The Case of Labor-Management Committees

Steven Ames Peterson, Thomas A. Leitko, Wilford G. Miles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Theoretical expectations of participatory theorists (e.g. Pateman, Blumberg) are applied to labor management committees (LMCs) in an effort to predict the spillover effects of workers’ participation in firm decision-making on their political and social participation. The two focal points are Jamestown, N.Y. and Buffalo, N.Y. Witte has argued that conditions may obstruct the hypothesized spillover effects from occurring: co-optation, structural impotence, and misrepresentation. In Jamestown and Buffalo, evidence that all three can be expected is found. The hypothesized spillover effects are not likely to emerge from the LMC experiments in the areas studied. It is suggested that structural impotence is perhaps the major obstruction to the spillover effect in these cases and in firms in capitalist economies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-44
Number of pages18
JournalEconomic and Industrial Democracy
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1981

Fingerprint

Personnel
Decision making
Experiments
Spillover effects
Worker participation
Labor management
Misrepresentation
Experiment
Political participation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Peterson, Steven Ames ; Leitko, Thomas A. ; Miles, Wilford G. / Worker Participation and the Spillover Effect : The Case of Labor-Management Committees. In: Economic and Industrial Democracy. 1981 ; Vol. 2, No. 1. pp. 27-44.
@article{4c80db47db5d413abf51ef9aeb1a658b,
title = "Worker Participation and the Spillover Effect: The Case of Labor-Management Committees",
abstract = "Theoretical expectations of participatory theorists (e.g. Pateman, Blumberg) are applied to labor management committees (LMCs) in an effort to predict the spillover effects of workers’ participation in firm decision-making on their political and social participation. The two focal points are Jamestown, N.Y. and Buffalo, N.Y. Witte has argued that conditions may obstruct the hypothesized spillover effects from occurring: co-optation, structural impotence, and misrepresentation. In Jamestown and Buffalo, evidence that all three can be expected is found. The hypothesized spillover effects are not likely to emerge from the LMC experiments in the areas studied. It is suggested that structural impotence is perhaps the major obstruction to the spillover effect in these cases and in firms in capitalist economies.",
author = "Peterson, {Steven Ames} and Leitko, {Thomas A.} and Miles, {Wilford G.}",
year = "1981",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0143831X8121003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "27--44",
journal = "Economic and Industrial Democracy",
issn = "0143-831X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Worker Participation and the Spillover Effect : The Case of Labor-Management Committees. / Peterson, Steven Ames; Leitko, Thomas A.; Miles, Wilford G.

In: Economic and Industrial Democracy, Vol. 2, No. 1, 01.01.1981, p. 27-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Worker Participation and the Spillover Effect

T2 - The Case of Labor-Management Committees

AU - Peterson, Steven Ames

AU - Leitko, Thomas A.

AU - Miles, Wilford G.

PY - 1981/1/1

Y1 - 1981/1/1

N2 - Theoretical expectations of participatory theorists (e.g. Pateman, Blumberg) are applied to labor management committees (LMCs) in an effort to predict the spillover effects of workers’ participation in firm decision-making on their political and social participation. The two focal points are Jamestown, N.Y. and Buffalo, N.Y. Witte has argued that conditions may obstruct the hypothesized spillover effects from occurring: co-optation, structural impotence, and misrepresentation. In Jamestown and Buffalo, evidence that all three can be expected is found. The hypothesized spillover effects are not likely to emerge from the LMC experiments in the areas studied. It is suggested that structural impotence is perhaps the major obstruction to the spillover effect in these cases and in firms in capitalist economies.

AB - Theoretical expectations of participatory theorists (e.g. Pateman, Blumberg) are applied to labor management committees (LMCs) in an effort to predict the spillover effects of workers’ participation in firm decision-making on their political and social participation. The two focal points are Jamestown, N.Y. and Buffalo, N.Y. Witte has argued that conditions may obstruct the hypothesized spillover effects from occurring: co-optation, structural impotence, and misrepresentation. In Jamestown and Buffalo, evidence that all three can be expected is found. The hypothesized spillover effects are not likely to emerge from the LMC experiments in the areas studied. It is suggested that structural impotence is perhaps the major obstruction to the spillover effect in these cases and in firms in capitalist economies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970296264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970296264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0143831X8121003

DO - 10.1177/0143831X8121003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84970296264

VL - 2

SP - 27

EP - 44

JO - Economic and Industrial Democracy

JF - Economic and Industrial Democracy

SN - 0143-831X

IS - 1

ER -