Working, but poor: The good life in rural America?

Brian C. Thiede, Daniel T. Lichter, Tim Slack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A secure job that pays above-poverty wages is a fundamental economic underpinning of a good life, but one that is absent or precarious for many workers in the rural United States. This paper examines the link between work and poverty in rural America, drawing comparisons over time and in relation to national averages and conditions in urban areas. Using data from the 2001 to 2014 Current Population Surveys, we address three analytic objectives. First, we track changes in the share of poor householders in work, and compare the prevalence of work between the rural and urban poor. Second, we estimate trends in the share of rural and urban workers who are poor, and highlight key social and demographic differentials. Third and finally, we estimate a series of logistic regression models to assess whether and to what extent rural-urban and temporal differences can be explained by the composition of the workforce and changes therein. Results show that an increasing share of the rural poor are out of work, and that the risk of poverty among those who are employed has also increased. While some of the longstanding rural disadvantage appears to have moderated in recent years, these changes are largely due to declining conditions in urban areas. Overall, our results support pessimistic conclusions about the economic status of rural America's workforce, and the ability of rural American's to meet the basic requisites of the good life through work.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)183-193
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Rural Studies
Volume59
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2018

Fingerprint

poverty
urban area
economics
wage
logistics
worker
regression
ability
trend
comparison

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Development
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Thiede, Brian C. ; Lichter, Daniel T. ; Slack, Tim. / Working, but poor : The good life in rural America?. In: Journal of Rural Studies. 2018 ; Vol. 59. pp. 183-193.
@article{768ebed6a6234c13b66f0e17cd73d0ac,
title = "Working, but poor: The good life in rural America?",
abstract = "A secure job that pays above-poverty wages is a fundamental economic underpinning of a good life, but one that is absent or precarious for many workers in the rural United States. This paper examines the link between work and poverty in rural America, drawing comparisons over time and in relation to national averages and conditions in urban areas. Using data from the 2001 to 2014 Current Population Surveys, we address three analytic objectives. First, we track changes in the share of poor householders in work, and compare the prevalence of work between the rural and urban poor. Second, we estimate trends in the share of rural and urban workers who are poor, and highlight key social and demographic differentials. Third and finally, we estimate a series of logistic regression models to assess whether and to what extent rural-urban and temporal differences can be explained by the composition of the workforce and changes therein. Results show that an increasing share of the rural poor are out of work, and that the risk of poverty among those who are employed has also increased. While some of the longstanding rural disadvantage appears to have moderated in recent years, these changes are largely due to declining conditions in urban areas. Overall, our results support pessimistic conclusions about the economic status of rural America's workforce, and the ability of rural American's to meet the basic requisites of the good life through work.",
author = "Thiede, {Brian C.} and Lichter, {Daniel T.} and Tim Slack",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.02.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "183--193",
journal = "Journal of Rural Studies",
issn = "0743-0167",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Working, but poor : The good life in rural America? / Thiede, Brian C.; Lichter, Daniel T.; Slack, Tim.

In: Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 59, 04.2018, p. 183-193.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Working, but poor

T2 - The good life in rural America?

AU - Thiede, Brian C.

AU - Lichter, Daniel T.

AU - Slack, Tim

PY - 2018/4

Y1 - 2018/4

N2 - A secure job that pays above-poverty wages is a fundamental economic underpinning of a good life, but one that is absent or precarious for many workers in the rural United States. This paper examines the link between work and poverty in rural America, drawing comparisons over time and in relation to national averages and conditions in urban areas. Using data from the 2001 to 2014 Current Population Surveys, we address three analytic objectives. First, we track changes in the share of poor householders in work, and compare the prevalence of work between the rural and urban poor. Second, we estimate trends in the share of rural and urban workers who are poor, and highlight key social and demographic differentials. Third and finally, we estimate a series of logistic regression models to assess whether and to what extent rural-urban and temporal differences can be explained by the composition of the workforce and changes therein. Results show that an increasing share of the rural poor are out of work, and that the risk of poverty among those who are employed has also increased. While some of the longstanding rural disadvantage appears to have moderated in recent years, these changes are largely due to declining conditions in urban areas. Overall, our results support pessimistic conclusions about the economic status of rural America's workforce, and the ability of rural American's to meet the basic requisites of the good life through work.

AB - A secure job that pays above-poverty wages is a fundamental economic underpinning of a good life, but one that is absent or precarious for many workers in the rural United States. This paper examines the link between work and poverty in rural America, drawing comparisons over time and in relation to national averages and conditions in urban areas. Using data from the 2001 to 2014 Current Population Surveys, we address three analytic objectives. First, we track changes in the share of poor householders in work, and compare the prevalence of work between the rural and urban poor. Second, we estimate trends in the share of rural and urban workers who are poor, and highlight key social and demographic differentials. Third and finally, we estimate a series of logistic regression models to assess whether and to what extent rural-urban and temporal differences can be explained by the composition of the workforce and changes therein. Results show that an increasing share of the rural poor are out of work, and that the risk of poverty among those who are employed has also increased. While some of the longstanding rural disadvantage appears to have moderated in recent years, these changes are largely due to declining conditions in urban areas. Overall, our results support pessimistic conclusions about the economic status of rural America's workforce, and the ability of rural American's to meet the basic requisites of the good life through work.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959526209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959526209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.02.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.02.007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84959526209

VL - 59

SP - 183

EP - 193

JO - Journal of Rural Studies

JF - Journal of Rural Studies

SN - 0743-0167

ER -