Working smarter, not harder: Objective-dependent management of an invasive thistle, Carduus nutans

Rui Zhang, Katriona Shea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Many invasive species managers state that their objective is to control an invader. However, the appropriate choice of a management option requires a more explicit statement of management objectives, in terms of both the relevant time horizon and spatial scale. Using data from a 2-yr mowing experiment, we show that the most effective management strategy for controlling an invasive thistle depends fundamentally on the management goals. We integrate field data from a two-cohort experiment with modeling to assess 14 mowing treatments (differing in intensity, frequency, and timing, and thus also in their required logistical effort) based on their effectiveness in (1) reducing population density of the existing cohort, (2) decreasing projected long-term population growth, and (3) limiting projected population spread of an invasive thistle, musk thistle (Carduus nutans L.). The treatment with high intensity and a single late mow caused the largest reduction in plant survival (and density of existing adult plants); the treatment with high intensity and an early mow in addition to a late mow was most effective at reducing population growth rate and population spread. Against expectation and conventional wisdom, the most frequent mowing treatment did not provide the most effective management outcome for any stated objective. This study highlights the necessity of clearly defined management aims; the term control is too vague to be truly useful. The results also provide important insights for the management of this invasive species.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)155-160
Number of pages6
JournalInvasive Plant Science and Management
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2019

Fingerprint

Carduus nutans
mowing
invasive species
population growth
mature plants
managers
population density

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Plant Science

Cite this

@article{973996fc75c940d7a0dfa6f2aa40538c,
title = "Working smarter, not harder: Objective-dependent management of an invasive thistle, Carduus nutans",
abstract = "Many invasive species managers state that their objective is to control an invader. However, the appropriate choice of a management option requires a more explicit statement of management objectives, in terms of both the relevant time horizon and spatial scale. Using data from a 2-yr mowing experiment, we show that the most effective management strategy for controlling an invasive thistle depends fundamentally on the management goals. We integrate field data from a two-cohort experiment with modeling to assess 14 mowing treatments (differing in intensity, frequency, and timing, and thus also in their required logistical effort) based on their effectiveness in (1) reducing population density of the existing cohort, (2) decreasing projected long-term population growth, and (3) limiting projected population spread of an invasive thistle, musk thistle (Carduus nutans L.). The treatment with high intensity and a single late mow caused the largest reduction in plant survival (and density of existing adult plants); the treatment with high intensity and an early mow in addition to a late mow was most effective at reducing population growth rate and population spread. Against expectation and conventional wisdom, the most frequent mowing treatment did not provide the most effective management outcome for any stated objective. This study highlights the necessity of clearly defined management aims; the term control is too vague to be truly useful. The results also provide important insights for the management of this invasive species.",
author = "Rui Zhang and Katriona Shea",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/inp.2019.18",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "155--160",
journal = "Invasive Plant Science and Management",
issn = "1939-7291",
publisher = "Allen Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Working smarter, not harder : Objective-dependent management of an invasive thistle, Carduus nutans. / Zhang, Rui; Shea, Katriona.

In: Invasive Plant Science and Management, Vol. 12, No. 3, 01.09.2019, p. 155-160.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Working smarter, not harder

T2 - Objective-dependent management of an invasive thistle, Carduus nutans

AU - Zhang, Rui

AU - Shea, Katriona

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - Many invasive species managers state that their objective is to control an invader. However, the appropriate choice of a management option requires a more explicit statement of management objectives, in terms of both the relevant time horizon and spatial scale. Using data from a 2-yr mowing experiment, we show that the most effective management strategy for controlling an invasive thistle depends fundamentally on the management goals. We integrate field data from a two-cohort experiment with modeling to assess 14 mowing treatments (differing in intensity, frequency, and timing, and thus also in their required logistical effort) based on their effectiveness in (1) reducing population density of the existing cohort, (2) decreasing projected long-term population growth, and (3) limiting projected population spread of an invasive thistle, musk thistle (Carduus nutans L.). The treatment with high intensity and a single late mow caused the largest reduction in plant survival (and density of existing adult plants); the treatment with high intensity and an early mow in addition to a late mow was most effective at reducing population growth rate and population spread. Against expectation and conventional wisdom, the most frequent mowing treatment did not provide the most effective management outcome for any stated objective. This study highlights the necessity of clearly defined management aims; the term control is too vague to be truly useful. The results also provide important insights for the management of this invasive species.

AB - Many invasive species managers state that their objective is to control an invader. However, the appropriate choice of a management option requires a more explicit statement of management objectives, in terms of both the relevant time horizon and spatial scale. Using data from a 2-yr mowing experiment, we show that the most effective management strategy for controlling an invasive thistle depends fundamentally on the management goals. We integrate field data from a two-cohort experiment with modeling to assess 14 mowing treatments (differing in intensity, frequency, and timing, and thus also in their required logistical effort) based on their effectiveness in (1) reducing population density of the existing cohort, (2) decreasing projected long-term population growth, and (3) limiting projected population spread of an invasive thistle, musk thistle (Carduus nutans L.). The treatment with high intensity and a single late mow caused the largest reduction in plant survival (and density of existing adult plants); the treatment with high intensity and an early mow in addition to a late mow was most effective at reducing population growth rate and population spread. Against expectation and conventional wisdom, the most frequent mowing treatment did not provide the most effective management outcome for any stated objective. This study highlights the necessity of clearly defined management aims; the term control is too vague to be truly useful. The results also provide important insights for the management of this invasive species.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073067008&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073067008&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/inp.2019.18

DO - 10.1017/inp.2019.18

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85073067008

VL - 12

SP - 155

EP - 160

JO - Invasive Plant Science and Management

JF - Invasive Plant Science and Management

SN - 1939-7291

IS - 3

ER -