Working with institutional stakeholders: Propositions for alternative approaches to community engagement

Jeffrey G. Cox, Minwoong Chung, Joseph A. Hamm, Adam Zwickle, Shannon M. Cruz, James W. Dearing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Community engagement is a vital aspect of addressing environmental contamination and remediation. In the United States, the Superfund Research Program (SRP) forms groups of academic researchers from the social and physical sciences into Community Engagement Cores (CECs) and Research Translation Cores (RTCs), which focus on various aspects of informing and working with communities during and through the resolution of environmental crises. While this work typically involves engaging directly with members of affected communities, no two situations are the same. In some cases, alternative approaches to community engagement can be more appropriate for community improvement than traditional approaches. In particular, when research teams become involved in contamination crises at a late point in the process, their contributions can be better directed at supporting and reinforcing the work of institutional stakeholders charged with remediating pollution. Relevant factors include issue fatigue among a local population, and contamination that is due to a major employer. Supported by literature and experience, we offer several propositions that we believe lay out conditions that warrant such an approach by academic teams, rather than their direct engagement with unaffiliated individuals in communities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number4010
JournalInternational journal of environmental research and public health
Volume16
Issue number20
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2 2019

Fingerprint

Research
Natural Science Disciplines
Social Sciences
Fatigue
Research Personnel
Population
Environmental Restoration and Remediation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

@article{9373402141c14e1d9c827296143a94e2,
title = "Working with institutional stakeholders: Propositions for alternative approaches to community engagement",
abstract = "Community engagement is a vital aspect of addressing environmental contamination and remediation. In the United States, the Superfund Research Program (SRP) forms groups of academic researchers from the social and physical sciences into Community Engagement Cores (CECs) and Research Translation Cores (RTCs), which focus on various aspects of informing and working with communities during and through the resolution of environmental crises. While this work typically involves engaging directly with members of affected communities, no two situations are the same. In some cases, alternative approaches to community engagement can be more appropriate for community improvement than traditional approaches. In particular, when research teams become involved in contamination crises at a late point in the process, their contributions can be better directed at supporting and reinforcing the work of institutional stakeholders charged with remediating pollution. Relevant factors include issue fatigue among a local population, and contamination that is due to a major employer. Supported by literature and experience, we offer several propositions that we believe lay out conditions that warrant such an approach by academic teams, rather than their direct engagement with unaffiliated individuals in communities.",
author = "Cox, {Jeffrey G.} and Minwoong Chung and Hamm, {Joseph A.} and Adam Zwickle and Cruz, {Shannon M.} and Dearing, {James W.}",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "2",
doi = "10.3390/ijerph16204010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
journal = "International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health",
issn = "1661-7827",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "20",

}

Working with institutional stakeholders : Propositions for alternative approaches to community engagement. / Cox, Jeffrey G.; Chung, Minwoong; Hamm, Joseph A.; Zwickle, Adam; Cruz, Shannon M.; Dearing, James W.

In: International journal of environmental research and public health, Vol. 16, No. 20, 4010, 02.10.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Working with institutional stakeholders

T2 - Propositions for alternative approaches to community engagement

AU - Cox, Jeffrey G.

AU - Chung, Minwoong

AU - Hamm, Joseph A.

AU - Zwickle, Adam

AU - Cruz, Shannon M.

AU - Dearing, James W.

PY - 2019/10/2

Y1 - 2019/10/2

N2 - Community engagement is a vital aspect of addressing environmental contamination and remediation. In the United States, the Superfund Research Program (SRP) forms groups of academic researchers from the social and physical sciences into Community Engagement Cores (CECs) and Research Translation Cores (RTCs), which focus on various aspects of informing and working with communities during and through the resolution of environmental crises. While this work typically involves engaging directly with members of affected communities, no two situations are the same. In some cases, alternative approaches to community engagement can be more appropriate for community improvement than traditional approaches. In particular, when research teams become involved in contamination crises at a late point in the process, their contributions can be better directed at supporting and reinforcing the work of institutional stakeholders charged with remediating pollution. Relevant factors include issue fatigue among a local population, and contamination that is due to a major employer. Supported by literature and experience, we offer several propositions that we believe lay out conditions that warrant such an approach by academic teams, rather than their direct engagement with unaffiliated individuals in communities.

AB - Community engagement is a vital aspect of addressing environmental contamination and remediation. In the United States, the Superfund Research Program (SRP) forms groups of academic researchers from the social and physical sciences into Community Engagement Cores (CECs) and Research Translation Cores (RTCs), which focus on various aspects of informing and working with communities during and through the resolution of environmental crises. While this work typically involves engaging directly with members of affected communities, no two situations are the same. In some cases, alternative approaches to community engagement can be more appropriate for community improvement than traditional approaches. In particular, when research teams become involved in contamination crises at a late point in the process, their contributions can be better directed at supporting and reinforcing the work of institutional stakeholders charged with remediating pollution. Relevant factors include issue fatigue among a local population, and contamination that is due to a major employer. Supported by literature and experience, we offer several propositions that we believe lay out conditions that warrant such an approach by academic teams, rather than their direct engagement with unaffiliated individuals in communities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073547169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073547169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/ijerph16204010

DO - 10.3390/ijerph16204010

M3 - Article

C2 - 31635112

AN - SCOPUS:85073547169

VL - 16

JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

SN - 1661-7827

IS - 20

M1 - 4010

ER -