Worry amplifies theory-of-mind reasoning for negatively valenced social stimuli in generalized anxiety disorder

Nur Hani Zainal, Michelle Gayle Newman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Theory-of-mind (ToM) is the ability to accurately infer others’ thoughts and feelings. In generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), cognitive and emotion regulation theories allude to the plausibility that ToM is conditional on the degree of individuals’ state worry, a hallmark symptom. GAD and state worry may interact to predict ToM constructs. However, no experiments have directly tested such interactional hypotheses, and used ToM as a framework to advance understanding of social cognition in GAD. This study therefore aimed to address this gap. Methods 171 participants (69 GAD, 102 Controls) were randomly assigned to either a Worry or Relaxation induction and completed well-validated ToM decoding (Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test) and reasoning (Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition) tasks. Results GAD status significantly interacted with state worry to predict accuracy of overall reasoning, cognitive-reasoning, positive-reasoning, and negative-reasoning ToM. Worry, as opposed to relaxation, led sufferers of GAD to display more accurate overall reasoning and cognitive-reasoning ToM than controls, especially for negative signals. Participants with GAD who worried, but not relaxed, were also significantly better than the norm at interpreting negative signals. These findings remained after controlling for gender, executive function, social anxiety, and depressive symptoms. For other ToM abilities, mean scores of persons with and without GAD who either worried or relaxed were normative. Limitations The ToM reasoning measure lacked self-reference, and these preliminary findings warrant replication. Conclusions Theoretical implications, such as the state worry-contingent nature of ToM in GAD, and clinical implications are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)824-833
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Affective Disorders
Volume227
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

Theory of Mind
Anxiety Disorders
Aptitude
Cognition
Emotions
Executive Function
Motion Pictures
Reading
Anxiety
Depression

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

@article{57ae473bdd5845f196f1b6c6861aa3fe,
title = "Worry amplifies theory-of-mind reasoning for negatively valenced social stimuli in generalized anxiety disorder",
abstract = "Background Theory-of-mind (ToM) is the ability to accurately infer others’ thoughts and feelings. In generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), cognitive and emotion regulation theories allude to the plausibility that ToM is conditional on the degree of individuals’ state worry, a hallmark symptom. GAD and state worry may interact to predict ToM constructs. However, no experiments have directly tested such interactional hypotheses, and used ToM as a framework to advance understanding of social cognition in GAD. This study therefore aimed to address this gap. Methods 171 participants (69 GAD, 102 Controls) were randomly assigned to either a Worry or Relaxation induction and completed well-validated ToM decoding (Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test) and reasoning (Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition) tasks. Results GAD status significantly interacted with state worry to predict accuracy of overall reasoning, cognitive-reasoning, positive-reasoning, and negative-reasoning ToM. Worry, as opposed to relaxation, led sufferers of GAD to display more accurate overall reasoning and cognitive-reasoning ToM than controls, especially for negative signals. Participants with GAD who worried, but not relaxed, were also significantly better than the norm at interpreting negative signals. These findings remained after controlling for gender, executive function, social anxiety, and depressive symptoms. For other ToM abilities, mean scores of persons with and without GAD who either worried or relaxed were normative. Limitations The ToM reasoning measure lacked self-reference, and these preliminary findings warrant replication. Conclusions Theoretical implications, such as the state worry-contingent nature of ToM in GAD, and clinical implications are discussed.",
author = "Zainal, {Nur Hani} and Newman, {Michelle Gayle}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.084",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "227",
pages = "824--833",
journal = "Journal of Affective Disorders",
issn = "0165-0327",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Worry amplifies theory-of-mind reasoning for negatively valenced social stimuli in generalized anxiety disorder. / Zainal, Nur Hani; Newman, Michelle Gayle.

In: Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 227, 01.02.2018, p. 824-833.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Worry amplifies theory-of-mind reasoning for negatively valenced social stimuli in generalized anxiety disorder

AU - Zainal, Nur Hani

AU - Newman, Michelle Gayle

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Background Theory-of-mind (ToM) is the ability to accurately infer others’ thoughts and feelings. In generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), cognitive and emotion regulation theories allude to the plausibility that ToM is conditional on the degree of individuals’ state worry, a hallmark symptom. GAD and state worry may interact to predict ToM constructs. However, no experiments have directly tested such interactional hypotheses, and used ToM as a framework to advance understanding of social cognition in GAD. This study therefore aimed to address this gap. Methods 171 participants (69 GAD, 102 Controls) were randomly assigned to either a Worry or Relaxation induction and completed well-validated ToM decoding (Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test) and reasoning (Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition) tasks. Results GAD status significantly interacted with state worry to predict accuracy of overall reasoning, cognitive-reasoning, positive-reasoning, and negative-reasoning ToM. Worry, as opposed to relaxation, led sufferers of GAD to display more accurate overall reasoning and cognitive-reasoning ToM than controls, especially for negative signals. Participants with GAD who worried, but not relaxed, were also significantly better than the norm at interpreting negative signals. These findings remained after controlling for gender, executive function, social anxiety, and depressive symptoms. For other ToM abilities, mean scores of persons with and without GAD who either worried or relaxed were normative. Limitations The ToM reasoning measure lacked self-reference, and these preliminary findings warrant replication. Conclusions Theoretical implications, such as the state worry-contingent nature of ToM in GAD, and clinical implications are discussed.

AB - Background Theory-of-mind (ToM) is the ability to accurately infer others’ thoughts and feelings. In generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), cognitive and emotion regulation theories allude to the plausibility that ToM is conditional on the degree of individuals’ state worry, a hallmark symptom. GAD and state worry may interact to predict ToM constructs. However, no experiments have directly tested such interactional hypotheses, and used ToM as a framework to advance understanding of social cognition in GAD. This study therefore aimed to address this gap. Methods 171 participants (69 GAD, 102 Controls) were randomly assigned to either a Worry or Relaxation induction and completed well-validated ToM decoding (Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test) and reasoning (Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition) tasks. Results GAD status significantly interacted with state worry to predict accuracy of overall reasoning, cognitive-reasoning, positive-reasoning, and negative-reasoning ToM. Worry, as opposed to relaxation, led sufferers of GAD to display more accurate overall reasoning and cognitive-reasoning ToM than controls, especially for negative signals. Participants with GAD who worried, but not relaxed, were also significantly better than the norm at interpreting negative signals. These findings remained after controlling for gender, executive function, social anxiety, and depressive symptoms. For other ToM abilities, mean scores of persons with and without GAD who either worried or relaxed were normative. Limitations The ToM reasoning measure lacked self-reference, and these preliminary findings warrant replication. Conclusions Theoretical implications, such as the state worry-contingent nature of ToM in GAD, and clinical implications are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035775955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035775955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.084

DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.084

M3 - Article

VL - 227

SP - 824

EP - 833

JO - Journal of Affective Disorders

JF - Journal of Affective Disorders

SN - 0165-0327

ER -