You can't make me do it, but i could be persuaded: A federalism perspective on the affordable care act

Simon F. Haeder, David L. Weimer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) seeks to change fundamentally the US health care system. The responses of states have been diverse and changing. What explains these diverse and dynamic responses? We examine the decision making of states concerning the creation of Pre-existing Condition Insurance Plan programs and insurance marketplaces and the expansion of Medicaid in historical context. This frames our analysis and its implications for future health reform in broader perspective by identifying a number of characteristics of state-federal grants programs: (1) slow and uneven implementation; (2) wide variation across states; (3) accommodation by the federal government; (4) ideological conflict; (5) state response to incentives; (6) incomplete take-up rates of eligible individuals; and (7) programs as stepping-stones and wedges. Assessing the implementation of the three main components of the ACA, we find that partisanship exerts significant influence, yet less so in the case of Medicaid expansion. Moreover, factors specific to the insurance market also play an important role. Finally, we conclude by applying the themes to theACAand offer an outlook for its continuing implementation. Specifically, we expect a gradual move toward universal state participation in the ACA, especially with respect to Medicaid expansion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)281-323
Number of pages43
JournalJournal of health politics, policy and law
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Medicaid
Insurance
Federal Government
Preexisting Condition Coverage
Organized Financing
Motivation
Decision Making
Delivery of Health Care
Health

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy

Cite this

@article{1c8c66ed5ef447e7ab7f21ba3b429969,
title = "You can't make me do it, but i could be persuaded: A federalism perspective on the affordable care act",
abstract = "The Affordable Care Act (ACA) seeks to change fundamentally the US health care system. The responses of states have been diverse and changing. What explains these diverse and dynamic responses? We examine the decision making of states concerning the creation of Pre-existing Condition Insurance Plan programs and insurance marketplaces and the expansion of Medicaid in historical context. This frames our analysis and its implications for future health reform in broader perspective by identifying a number of characteristics of state-federal grants programs: (1) slow and uneven implementation; (2) wide variation across states; (3) accommodation by the federal government; (4) ideological conflict; (5) state response to incentives; (6) incomplete take-up rates of eligible individuals; and (7) programs as stepping-stones and wedges. Assessing the implementation of the three main components of the ACA, we find that partisanship exerts significant influence, yet less so in the case of Medicaid expansion. Moreover, factors specific to the insurance market also play an important role. Finally, we conclude by applying the themes to theACAand offer an outlook for its continuing implementation. Specifically, we expect a gradual move toward universal state participation in the ACA, especially with respect to Medicaid expansion.",
author = "Haeder, {Simon F.} and Weimer, {David L.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1215/03616878-2882219",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "281--323",
journal = "Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law",
issn = "0361-6878",
publisher = "Duke University Press",
number = "2",

}

You can't make me do it, but i could be persuaded : A federalism perspective on the affordable care act. / Haeder, Simon F.; Weimer, David L.

In: Journal of health politics, policy and law, Vol. 40, No. 2, 01.01.2015, p. 281-323.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - You can't make me do it, but i could be persuaded

T2 - A federalism perspective on the affordable care act

AU - Haeder, Simon F.

AU - Weimer, David L.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - The Affordable Care Act (ACA) seeks to change fundamentally the US health care system. The responses of states have been diverse and changing. What explains these diverse and dynamic responses? We examine the decision making of states concerning the creation of Pre-existing Condition Insurance Plan programs and insurance marketplaces and the expansion of Medicaid in historical context. This frames our analysis and its implications for future health reform in broader perspective by identifying a number of characteristics of state-federal grants programs: (1) slow and uneven implementation; (2) wide variation across states; (3) accommodation by the federal government; (4) ideological conflict; (5) state response to incentives; (6) incomplete take-up rates of eligible individuals; and (7) programs as stepping-stones and wedges. Assessing the implementation of the three main components of the ACA, we find that partisanship exerts significant influence, yet less so in the case of Medicaid expansion. Moreover, factors specific to the insurance market also play an important role. Finally, we conclude by applying the themes to theACAand offer an outlook for its continuing implementation. Specifically, we expect a gradual move toward universal state participation in the ACA, especially with respect to Medicaid expansion.

AB - The Affordable Care Act (ACA) seeks to change fundamentally the US health care system. The responses of states have been diverse and changing. What explains these diverse and dynamic responses? We examine the decision making of states concerning the creation of Pre-existing Condition Insurance Plan programs and insurance marketplaces and the expansion of Medicaid in historical context. This frames our analysis and its implications for future health reform in broader perspective by identifying a number of characteristics of state-federal grants programs: (1) slow and uneven implementation; (2) wide variation across states; (3) accommodation by the federal government; (4) ideological conflict; (5) state response to incentives; (6) incomplete take-up rates of eligible individuals; and (7) programs as stepping-stones and wedges. Assessing the implementation of the three main components of the ACA, we find that partisanship exerts significant influence, yet less so in the case of Medicaid expansion. Moreover, factors specific to the insurance market also play an important role. Finally, we conclude by applying the themes to theACAand offer an outlook for its continuing implementation. Specifically, we expect a gradual move toward universal state participation in the ACA, especially with respect to Medicaid expansion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929578840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929578840&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1215/03616878-2882219

DO - 10.1215/03616878-2882219

M3 - Article

C2 - 25646388

AN - SCOPUS:84929578840

VL - 40

SP - 281

EP - 323

JO - Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

JF - Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

SN - 0361-6878

IS - 2

ER -