You Say dientito, I Say dentito: Navigating Complex Word Formation in Second Language Spanish

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Native speakers seamlessly marshal morphological resources to create new words, displaying striking consistency even where multiple options are available, as when a stem contains a phonological alternation. This is true even when these options appear to be idiosyncratically applied in existing words. For example, in derived words, the alternation of diphthongs and monophthongs in certain Spanish stems defies traditional morphophonological analysis, but native speakers nonetheless agree on when to use one and when to use the other in novel derivations. Here we ask how second language learners of Spanish cope with this subtlety. Recently, native speakers’ agreement has been attributed to the way phonotactic and morpholexical properties influence morphological processing. In a lexical decision experiment, we show that while the polarity of learners’ responses differed from earlier native speaker results, their response latencies exhibit striking sensitivity to the very same ingredients shown to predict nativelike behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)599-630
Number of pages32
JournalLanguage Learning
Volume67
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

Spanish language
experiment
language
resources
Native Speaker
Word Formation
Spanish Language
Alternation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{e315fd5423414c5e87047b6b087b62b3,
title = "You Say dientito, I Say dentito: Navigating Complex Word Formation in Second Language Spanish",
abstract = "Native speakers seamlessly marshal morphological resources to create new words, displaying striking consistency even where multiple options are available, as when a stem contains a phonological alternation. This is true even when these options appear to be idiosyncratically applied in existing words. For example, in derived words, the alternation of diphthongs and monophthongs in certain Spanish stems defies traditional morphophonological analysis, but native speakers nonetheless agree on when to use one and when to use the other in novel derivations. Here we ask how second language learners of Spanish cope with this subtlety. Recently, native speakers’ agreement has been attributed to the way phonotactic and morpholexical properties influence morphological processing. In a lexical decision experiment, we show that while the polarity of learners’ responses differed from earlier native speaker results, their response latencies exhibit striking sensitivity to the very same ingredients shown to predict nativelike behavior.",
author = "Carlson, {Matthew Thomas} and Chip Gerfen",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/lang.12239",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "599--630",
journal = "Language Learning",
issn = "0023-8333",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

You Say dientito, I Say dentito : Navigating Complex Word Formation in Second Language Spanish. / Carlson, Matthew Thomas; Gerfen, Chip.

In: Language Learning, Vol. 67, No. 3, 01.09.2017, p. 599-630.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - You Say dientito, I Say dentito

T2 - Navigating Complex Word Formation in Second Language Spanish

AU - Carlson, Matthew Thomas

AU - Gerfen, Chip

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Native speakers seamlessly marshal morphological resources to create new words, displaying striking consistency even where multiple options are available, as when a stem contains a phonological alternation. This is true even when these options appear to be idiosyncratically applied in existing words. For example, in derived words, the alternation of diphthongs and monophthongs in certain Spanish stems defies traditional morphophonological analysis, but native speakers nonetheless agree on when to use one and when to use the other in novel derivations. Here we ask how second language learners of Spanish cope with this subtlety. Recently, native speakers’ agreement has been attributed to the way phonotactic and morpholexical properties influence morphological processing. In a lexical decision experiment, we show that while the polarity of learners’ responses differed from earlier native speaker results, their response latencies exhibit striking sensitivity to the very same ingredients shown to predict nativelike behavior.

AB - Native speakers seamlessly marshal morphological resources to create new words, displaying striking consistency even where multiple options are available, as when a stem contains a phonological alternation. This is true even when these options appear to be idiosyncratically applied in existing words. For example, in derived words, the alternation of diphthongs and monophthongs in certain Spanish stems defies traditional morphophonological analysis, but native speakers nonetheless agree on when to use one and when to use the other in novel derivations. Here we ask how second language learners of Spanish cope with this subtlety. Recently, native speakers’ agreement has been attributed to the way phonotactic and morpholexical properties influence morphological processing. In a lexical decision experiment, we show that while the polarity of learners’ responses differed from earlier native speaker results, their response latencies exhibit striking sensitivity to the very same ingredients shown to predict nativelike behavior.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018607879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018607879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/lang.12239

DO - 10.1111/lang.12239

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85018607879

VL - 67

SP - 599

EP - 630

JO - Language Learning

JF - Language Learning

SN - 0023-8333

IS - 3

ER -