Young children's behavioral and neural responses to peer feedback relate to internalizing problems

Santiago Morales, Alicia Vallorani, Koraly Elisa Perez-Edgar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Despite the importance of peer experiences during early childhood for socioemotional development, few studies have examined how young children process and respond to peer feedback. The current study used an ecologically valid experimental paradigm to study young children's processing of peer social acceptance or rejection. In this paradigm, 118 children (50% boys; Mage = 72.92 months; SD = 9.30; Rangeage = 53.19–98.86 months) sorted pictures of unknown, similar-aged peers into those with whom they wished or did not wish to play. They were later told how these peers sorted them, such that in half of the cases the presumed peer accepted or rejected the participant. When rejected children reported more distress (sadness), they were slower to rate their affective response, and exhibited increased mid-frontal EEG theta power, compared to when accepted. Moreover, we found that children's affective responses and EEG theta power for rejection predicted internalizing problems, especially if they displayed an attention bias to social threat. Our results further validate and illustrate the utility of this paradigm for studying how young children process and respond to peer feedback.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number100610
JournalDevelopmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Volume36
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

Social Distance
Electroencephalography
Power (Psychology)
Rejection (Psychology)

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

@article{d29051316c5c4ab2ad327299c8cc2a41,
title = "Young children's behavioral and neural responses to peer feedback relate to internalizing problems",
abstract = "Despite the importance of peer experiences during early childhood for socioemotional development, few studies have examined how young children process and respond to peer feedback. The current study used an ecologically valid experimental paradigm to study young children's processing of peer social acceptance or rejection. In this paradigm, 118 children (50{\%} boys; Mage = 72.92 months; SD = 9.30; Rangeage = 53.19–98.86 months) sorted pictures of unknown, similar-aged peers into those with whom they wished or did not wish to play. They were later told how these peers sorted them, such that in half of the cases the presumed peer accepted or rejected the participant. When rejected children reported more distress (sadness), they were slower to rate their affective response, and exhibited increased mid-frontal EEG theta power, compared to when accepted. Moreover, we found that children's affective responses and EEG theta power for rejection predicted internalizing problems, especially if they displayed an attention bias to social threat. Our results further validate and illustrate the utility of this paradigm for studying how young children process and respond to peer feedback.",
author = "Santiago Morales and Alicia Vallorani and Perez-Edgar, {Koraly Elisa}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.dcn.2018.12.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
journal = "Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience",
issn = "1878-9293",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Young children's behavioral and neural responses to peer feedback relate to internalizing problems. / Morales, Santiago; Vallorani, Alicia; Perez-Edgar, Koraly Elisa.

In: Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol. 36, 100610, 01.04.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Young children's behavioral and neural responses to peer feedback relate to internalizing problems

AU - Morales, Santiago

AU - Vallorani, Alicia

AU - Perez-Edgar, Koraly Elisa

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Despite the importance of peer experiences during early childhood for socioemotional development, few studies have examined how young children process and respond to peer feedback. The current study used an ecologically valid experimental paradigm to study young children's processing of peer social acceptance or rejection. In this paradigm, 118 children (50% boys; Mage = 72.92 months; SD = 9.30; Rangeage = 53.19–98.86 months) sorted pictures of unknown, similar-aged peers into those with whom they wished or did not wish to play. They were later told how these peers sorted them, such that in half of the cases the presumed peer accepted or rejected the participant. When rejected children reported more distress (sadness), they were slower to rate their affective response, and exhibited increased mid-frontal EEG theta power, compared to when accepted. Moreover, we found that children's affective responses and EEG theta power for rejection predicted internalizing problems, especially if they displayed an attention bias to social threat. Our results further validate and illustrate the utility of this paradigm for studying how young children process and respond to peer feedback.

AB - Despite the importance of peer experiences during early childhood for socioemotional development, few studies have examined how young children process and respond to peer feedback. The current study used an ecologically valid experimental paradigm to study young children's processing of peer social acceptance or rejection. In this paradigm, 118 children (50% boys; Mage = 72.92 months; SD = 9.30; Rangeage = 53.19–98.86 months) sorted pictures of unknown, similar-aged peers into those with whom they wished or did not wish to play. They were later told how these peers sorted them, such that in half of the cases the presumed peer accepted or rejected the participant. When rejected children reported more distress (sadness), they were slower to rate their affective response, and exhibited increased mid-frontal EEG theta power, compared to when accepted. Moreover, we found that children's affective responses and EEG theta power for rejection predicted internalizing problems, especially if they displayed an attention bias to social threat. Our results further validate and illustrate the utility of this paradigm for studying how young children process and respond to peer feedback.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058621910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058621910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.12.008

DO - 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.12.008

M3 - Article

VL - 36

JO - Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

JF - Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

SN - 1878-9293

M1 - 100610

ER -